The world's dumbest narrative in sports--and it drives me crazy--is that the final score of a football game allows sportswriter/gurus to distinguish precise differences in the calibre of the opposing quarterbacks. So, Bills 27, Ravens 25 proves Josh Allen is a better quarterback than Lamar Jackson, right? And neither of them are as good as Patrick Mahomes, as proven by the Chiefs 32 to 29 victory. Nope, Josh will never go to the Super Bowl, and the Ravens can never beat the Bills.
Until they do, of course. All this talk about legacy, stats and all falls apart, especially when KC gets their asses handed to them after being blown out 40 to 22 by the Eagles and Jaylen Hurts.
So cut me a break. Football is a team sport, and the other guys on the roster do matter. It is incomprehensible that a game with 22 men on the field depends only on the quarterback. For those idiots who think that playoff games determine who is the better quarterback, are you going to now say that Hurts is 22 points "better" than Patrick Mahomes? All the accolades for Mahomes (first ballot Hall of Famer, the best in history, blah, blah, blah) now falls to Hurts? We hear such garbage even from the most prestigious sports journalists, like ESPN and Fox Sports (I'd shut them off, but I'm a sports addict and condemned to listen on my car radio).
The obvious conclusion is that the team with the best quarterback does not always win. Sometimes Brady gets beat by Nick Foles. Sometimes Trent Dilfer and Kerry Collins make it to the Super Bowl, while Peyton Manning and Brett Favre stay home. This is proof positive that the rest of the team matters.
How about a hypothetical trade as a true gauge of value? Let's consider possible trades: Mahomes for Allen, Mahomes for Jackson, Allen for Jackson. I doubt whether any of their teams would want to make such a deal. It's not Fantasy Football where you just install your new guy in the lineup and he performs the same. Each team would have to totally revamp their offense, and it would take at least a year and maybe two to get familiar with the other players and coaches. Mahomes is the best man for the Chiefs, Lamar is the best for the Ravens, and Josh is the best for Buffalo. So, based on this reasoning, their value is greatest for the team they are on.
Now, in 2021, The trade of Matt Stafford for Jared Goff plus draft picks proved that the Rams did like Stafford much better than Goff. Not all starting QBs are equal. It does not prove, however, that the Rams had zero chance to ever win the Super Bowl with Goff (who, by the way, has significantly upped his game). It just means that they thought they were a better team with Stafford at the controls. They were right, and they have rings to prove it.
Similarly, the Browns passed up the opportunity to retain Baker Mayfield at about $30 million per year, in order to obtain the services of Deshaun Watson at $46 mil, plus giving up six draft picks including three first rounders. Just look at the value: one quarterback threw 41 TDs and had a rating of 106.8; the other guy had 5 TDs and a rating of 79.0 Unfortunately, the Browns cut the good QB and signed the mediocre one, suggesting that quarterback evaluation is not always accurate.